Modeling Dependence Relationships of Anthropometric Variables Using Copula Approach

Funmilayo Westnand Oshogboye Saporu, Isaac Esbond Gongsin
2020 American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics  
Copula model is introduced in modeling the co-dependence structures of anthropometric variables-Body mass index (BMI), Abdominal circumference, Adiposity and Percent body fat-because it can capture monotonic dependence. Four copula-based Kumaraswamy-epsilon distributions are derived and used to determine the best fit to the anthropometric data, these are new. These are the Gaussian, Clayton, Frank and Gumbel copulas. Clayton model provided the best fit in four bivariate pairs-BMI and Percent
more » ... -BMI and Percent body fat, BMI and Abdominal circumference, Adiposity and Abdominal circumference and Abdominal circumference and Percent body fat-while Gaussian is best for BMI and Adiposity pair and Frank is best for Adiposity and Percent body fat pair. Copula-based Kendall's tau and tail dependence are used as estimates for measuring the strength of the co-dependence. The results strongly recommend the use of BMI as an anthropometric index for estimating human body composition of adiposity. However for individuals with BMI values in the two extreme tails, their adiposity should be measured directly. The results do not find any suitable anthropometric indices for estimating percent body fat and therefore is recommended that for such epidemiological research, percent body fat should be measured directly. The results also clearly show that the Kendall's tau and the corresponding Pearson correlation coefficient estimates are largely at variance whenever the co-dependence structure cannot be described as linear dependence. This can prompt contradictory conclusions. It is therefore suggested that for such research, whenever Pearson correlation coefficient method is in use, a coefficient of determination of a minimum of 75% should be obtained before any anthropometric index can be recommended for body composition substitution.
doi:10.11648/j.ajtas.20200905.18 fatcat:56letlddgvar7bp3rfjsk2rcru