A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2020; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
Three Hypotheses for Explaining the So-Called Oppression of Men
2019
Feminist Philosophy Quarterly
Preserved Fulltext
Are men oppressed as men? The evidence given in support of affirmative responses to this question usually consists in examples of harms, limitations, or requirements masculinity imposes on men: men are expected to pay on dates, men must be breadwinners for their families, men can be drafted for war, and so forth. This article explicates three hypotheses that account for the harms, limitations, and requirements masculinity imposes on men and, drawing on the work of Alison Jaggar, seeks to show
doi:10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7291
fatcat:j4eurtzf45hqvmvihpvtzup4tu