Gesammelte Werke [review-book]

H. N. Gardiner
1912 Philosophical Review  
Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid--seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non--commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal
more » ... out Early Journal Content at JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not--for--profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact THE PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW. [VOL. XXI. sayings, rising frequently to a high level of insight into the philosophy of man and of his history and to a dignified eloquence of expression, the book gives one great pleasure in the reading. I have found his discussion of the functional relation of selves to time vague and unsatisfactory. And I think that Dr. Ward would admit that his treatment of the problem of evil leaves it still a pretty dark mystery. On the other hand, the treatment of the epigenetic character of evolution, and of the social historical origin of rationality, moral order, and moral evil are excellent. His statement of a pluralistic Weltanschauung as starting point is the sanest and best balanced that I have yet seen. His method of advance from pluralism towards the conception of God as the ground of the unity of direction in evolution and the principle of the conservation of human values seems to me the only fruitful method for a theistic metaphysics to-day. Professor Ward has produced a notable contribution towards the clarification and justification of a religious world-view. There is much in the spirit of the work that reminds one of Kant's Critique of Practical Reason. On the whole Dr. Ward's world view would be least erroneously described as Leibnitz' Monadology cleared of its inconsistencies and made to square with epigenetic evolution.
doi:10.2307/2177720 fatcat:zjjlt6ef6nbivdozakknrsu7l4