Phase I/II Trial of Orteronel (TAK-700)—an Investigational 17,20-Lyase Inhibitor—in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Robert Dreicer, David MacLean, Ajit Suri, Walter M. Stadler, Daniel Shevrin, Lowell Hart, Gary R. MacVicar, Omid Hamid, John Hainsworth, Mitchell E. Gross, Yuanjun Shi, Iain J. Webb (+1 others)
2014 Clinical Cancer Research  
Purpose: The androgen receptor pathway remains active in men with prostate cancer whose disease has progressed following surgical or medical castration. Orteronel (TAK-700) is an investigational, oral, nonsteroidal, selective, reversible inhibitor of 17,20-lyase, a key enzyme in the production of androgenic hormones. Experimental Design: We conducted a phase I/II study in men with progressive, chemotherapy-na€ ve, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and serum testosterone <50
more » ... In the phase I part, patients received orteronel 100 to 600 mg twice daily or 400 mg twice a day plus prednisone 5 mg twice a day. In phase II, patients received orteronel 300 mg twice a day, 400 mg twice a day plus prednisone, 600 mg twice a day plus prednisone, or 600 mg once a day without prednisone. Results: In phase I (n ¼ 26), no dose-limiting toxicities were observed and 13 of 20 evaluable patients (65%) achieved !50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline from baseline at 12 weeks. In phase II (n ¼ 97), 45 of 84 evaluable patients (54%) achieved a !50% decline in PSA and at 12 weeks, substantial mean reductions from baseline in testosterone (À7.5 ng/dL) and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (À45.3 mg/dL) were observed. Unconfirmed partial responses were reported in 10 of 51 evaluable phase II patients (20%). Decreases in circulating tumor cells were documented. Fifty-three percent of phase II patients experienced grade !3 adverse events irrespective of causality; most common were fatigue, hypokalemia, hyperglycemia, and diarrhea. Conclusions: 17,20-Lyase inhibition by orteronel was tolerable and results in declines in PSA and testosterone, with evidence of radiographic responses. Clin Cancer Res; 20(5); 1335-44. Ó2014 AACR.
doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-2436 pmid:24418642 fatcat:d4zojjfqz5d3dkehxwoig3iwki