Prioritizing rare tree species of the Cerrado-Amazon ecotone: warnings and insights emerging from a comprehensive transitional zone of South America

Everton A. Maciel, Ary T. Oliveira-Filho, Pedro V. Eisenlohr
2016 Natureza & Conservação  
n a t u r e z a & c o n s e r v a ç ã o 1 4 (2 0 1 6) 74-82 h t t p : / / w w w . n a t u r e z a e c o n s e r v a c a o . c o m . b r IUCN Red list conservation gaps Regional responsibility Local rarity Vulnerable habitat a b s t r a c t Many locally and regionally rare species are not covered by red lists, thus compromising conservation strategies. This is the case with ecotones. After applying three rarity criteria based on both geographic range and on local occurrences to 1755 species of a
more » ... o 1755 species of a large transitional zone in South America, we discuss how the priority hierarchy found in the study region can be combined with red books in decision-making to reduce the gaps left by the classification systems adopted by these lists. We point out clear directions about how these species can be used to guide decision making in ecotones, including identifying species of interest for conservation that have not yet been included in red lists, structuring a species group of narrow distribution occurring in areas adjacent to ecological transitions into a hierarchy of priorities for conservation, and using species of the highest hierarchy position in decision making. We believe that the combination of regional lists with national and international red lists is an interesting strategy in the management of species for conservation. (P.V. Eisenlohr). priorities (e.g., Gauthier et al., 2010) . Among them, the method proposed by Gauthier et al. (2010) is very simple and practical for the evaluation of different types of plant rarities. Basically, this method consists in drawing up a list of priority species for regional conservation from three priority criteria, named, Regional Responsibility, Local Rarity and Habitat Vulnerable. To operate these criteria, the authors propose a scale with five priority classes, in which the scores range from 1 to 5, http://dx.
doi:10.1016/j.ncon.2016.10.002 fatcat:gms27dxlm5g55gcpfvhlfxgmqy