Effort–reward imbalance at work and risk of depressive disorders. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Reiner Rugulies, Birgit Aust, Ida EH Madsen
2017 Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health  
Effort-reward imbalance at work and risk of depressive disorders. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Rugulies R, Aust B, Madsen IEH Effort-reward imbalance at work predicted a 1.5-fold increased risk of depressive disorders in this systematic review and meta-analysis of eight prospective cohort studies from Europe, Canada and the USA. This study provides the hitherto strongest evidence for a possible role of effort-reward imbalance in the etiology of
more » ... tiology of depressive disorders. Affiliation: Rugulies R, Aust B, Madsen IEH. Effort-reward imbalance at work and risk of depressive disorders. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies -Scand J Work Environ Health. Objective The aim of this review was to determine whether employees exposed to effort-reward imbalance (ERI) at work have a higher risk of depressive disorders than non-exposed employees. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published prospective cohort studies examining the association of ERI at baseline with onset of depressive disorders at follow-up. The work was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and a detailed study protocol was registered before literature search commenced (Registration number: CRD42016047581). We obtained a summary estimate for the association of ERI with risk of depressive disorders by pooling the study-specific estimates in a meta-analysis. We further conducted pre-defined sensitivity analyses. Results We identified eight eligible cohort studies, encompassing 84 963 employees and 2897 (3.4%) new cases of depressive disorders. Seven of the eight studies suggested an increased risk of depressive disorders among employees exposed to ERI. The pooled random-effects estimate was 1.49 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.23-1.80, P<0.001], indicating that ERI predicts risk of depressive disorders. The estimate was robust in sensitivity analyses stratified by study quality, type of ERI ascertainment and type depressive disorder ascertainment, respectively. Conclusions Employees exposed to ERI were at increased risk of depressive disorder. Future studies on ERI and depressive disorders should examine if this association is stronger or weaker when ERI is measured repeatedly during follow-up and with other methods than self-report or when depressive disorders are ascertained with clinical diagnostic interviews.
doi:10.5271/sjweh.3632 pmid:28306759 fatcat:ovfzhhdnpncxrauftgocxjb3d4