Abstracts of Recent American Decisions [stub]

1875 The American Law Register (1852-1891)  
Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid--seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non--commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal
more » ... out Early Journal Content at http://about.jstor.org/participate--jstor/individuals/early-journal--content. JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not--for--profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. ABSTRACTS OF RECENT DECISIONS. ABSTRACTS OF RECENT DECISIONS. devolved on them the duty to pass upon the constitutional validity sometimes of legislative and sometimes of executive acts. The duty of determining the constitutionality of an act performed by.executive officers has been devolved on this court by the controversy arising in the prosecution of the charge against Jones of the offence of usurpation of office. That duty we now proceed to discharge by adjudging-First. That the constitutional provisions relating to duelling are not self-executing except to the extent that persons who cannot, or will not, take the constitutional oath, are thereby prevented from holding office. Second. That a citizen who denies that he is guilty of having violated those provisions, and is willing to take the oath of office, may enter upon and discharge the duties thereof, without subjecting himself to an indictiment for usurpation of office, until he has first been indicted, tried and convicted for the disqualifying offence ; but that if he takes the oath falsely and corruptly, he may be indicted and prosecuted for the crime thereby committed. Third. That the statutes regulating the proceedings and prescribing the duties of the Contesting Board in elections for clerk of the Court of Appeals do not empower said board to enter into an original inquiry as to whether the party elected has, by a violation of said constitutional provisions, subjected himself to be deprived of the right to hold office, nor upon their own conviction as to his guilt, to adjudge him not entitled to the office and thereupon to declare it vacant. Fourth. That the legislature could not, if it had attempted so to do, have conferred such a power upon a board or tribunal composed of executive officers. Wherefore, upon the whole case, the judgment of the Criminal Court sustaining the demurrer to the indictment must be affirmed.
fatcat:g5f5s336qrbcxam34fkyaijjue