Learning 2-in-1: towards integrated EEG-fMRI-neurofeedback [article]

Lorraine Perronnet, Anatole Lecuyer, Marsel Mano, Maureen Clerc, Fabien Lotte, Christian Barillot
2018 bioRxiv   pre-print
Neurofeedback (NF) allows to exert self-regulation over specific aspects of one's own brain function by returning information extracted in real-time from brain activity measures. These measures are usually acquired from a single modality, most commonly EEG or fMRI. EEG-fMRI-neurofeedback (EEG-fMRI-NF) is a new NF approach that consists of providing a NF based simultaneously on EEG and fMRI. By exploiting the complementarity of these two modalities, EEG-fMRI-NF opens a spectrum of possibilities
more » ... or defining bimodal NF targets that could be more robust, flexible and effective than unimodal ones. However, facing a greater amount of information, the question arises of how to represent the EEG and fMRI features simultaneously in order to allow the subject to achieve better self-regulation. In this work, we propose that the EEG and fMRI features should be represented in a single bimodal feedback, which we refer to as integrated feedback. We then introduce two integrated feedback strategies for EEG-fMRI-NF and compare their early effects on a motor imagery task with a between-group design. The first group (BI DIM, n=10) was shown a two-dimensional (2D) feedback in which each dimension depicted the information from one modality. The second group (UNI DIM, n=10) was shown a one-dimensional (1D) feedback that integrated both types of information even further by merging them into one. Online fMRI activations were significantly higher in the UNI DIM group than in the BI DIM group, which suggests that the 1D feedback is easier to control than the 2D feedback. However, when looking at posthoc activation levels, the difference of fMRI activation levels between the NF runs and the preliminary motor imagery run without NF was more significant in the 2D group. Moreover, subjects from the BI DIM group produced more specific BOLD activations with a notably stronger activation in the right superior parietal lobule (BI DIM > UNI DIM, p < 0.001, uncorrected). These results suggest that the 2D feedback encourages subjects to explore their strategies to recruit more specific brain patterns. To summarize, our study shows that 1D and 2D integrated feedbacks are effective but also appear to be complementary and could therefore be used in combination in a bimodal NF training program. Altogether, our study paves the way to novel integrated feedback strategies for the development of flexible and effective bimodal NF paradigms making the most of the bimodal information and better suited to clinical applications.
doi:10.1101/397729 fatcat:vq6e77tnpfg4npmuhrnsrabcoe