A Counterexample to Plantinga's Free Will Defense

Alexander R. Pruss
2012 Faith and Philosophy  
Plantinga's Free Will Defense is an argument that, possibly, God cannot actualize a world containing significant creaturely free will and no wrongdoings. I will argue that if standard Molinism is true, there is a pair of worlds w 1 and w 2 each of which contains a significantly free creature who never chooses wrongly, and that are such that, necessarily, at least one of these worlds is a world that God can actualize.
doi:10.5840/faithphil201229442 fatcat:v2ahdtiqebbn7ltyb3tgdqnytq