A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2020; you can also visit <a rel="external noopener" href="https://content.sciendo.com/downloadpdf/journals/hjbpa/9/3/article-p7.pdf">the original URL</a>. The file type is <code>application/pdf</code>.
<i title="Walter de Gruyter GmbH">
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/container/ejrkwasgonhr7fcyuguj7ezwou" style="color: black;">Holistica</a>
This paper puts forth a new scholarly approach to trade negotiations, for practitioners of international agreements, or simply to business students attempting to understand Ricardian trade theory. The paper hypothesizes that matrices can provide a simpler conceptual framework for considering Ricardo's comparative advantage, especially when multiple goods and multiple countries are involved, in order to determine which countries should produce which goods. Numerous theoretical examples are<span class="external-identifiers"> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2018-0019">doi:10.2478/hjbpa-2018-0019</a> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/release/xeralglq6vf7pajk6cvnyojvau">fatcat:xeralglq6vf7pajk6cvnyojvau</a> </span>
more »... ted, singularly, and jointly, as are different possible flaws and assumptions, additional applications, and alternative uses of the matrices, such as employing matrices to increase production of certain goods needed during crises or shortages. The article also argues that "terms of trade" should not be "assumed" in trade models but be based upon indifference curves, and addresses other influencing factors such as neoclassical changes in utility or in production. Found valid, the paper applies this method of trade simplification to pressing international situations, the question of "Brexit," the sobriquet for the United Kingdom's effort to withdraw from the European Union, which creates interesting possibilities for new trade deals, and the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The conclusion conceptually compares bilateral and multilateral trade, singularly, and with all countries together.
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20200213052222/https://content.sciendo.com/downloadpdf/journals/hjbpa/9/3/article-p7.pdf" title="fulltext PDF download" data-goatcounter-click="serp-fulltext" data-goatcounter-title="serp-fulltext"> <button class="ui simple right pointing dropdown compact black labeled icon button serp-button"> <i class="icon ia-icon"></i> Web Archive [PDF] <div class="menu fulltext-thumbnail"> <img src="https://blobs.fatcat.wiki/thumbnail/pdf/0e/6a/0e6a5faa324889745369b8921f84552d7974d6de.180px.jpg" alt="fulltext thumbnail" loading="lazy"> </div> </button> </a> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2018-0019"> <button class="ui left aligned compact blue labeled icon button serp-button"> <i class="unlock alternate icon" style="background-color: #fb971f;"></i> Publisher / doi.org </button> </a>