International application of PROMIS® computerized adaptive tests: US versus country-specific item parameters can be consequential for individual patient scores

Caroline B. Terwee, Martine H.P. Crins, Leo D. Roorda, Karon F. CooK, David Cella, Niels Smits, Benjamin D. Schalet
2021 Journal of Clinical Epidemiology  
PROMIS® offers computerized adaptive tests (CAT) of patient-reported outcomes, using a single set of US-based IRT item parameters across populations and language-versions. The use of country-specific item parameters has local appeal, but also disadvantages. We illustrate the effects of choosing US or country-specific item parameters on PROMIS CAT T-scores. Simulations were performed on response data from Dutch chronic pain patients (n=1110) who completed the PROMIS Pain Behavior item bank. We
more » ... mpared CAT T-scores obtained with (1) US parameters; (2) Dutch item parameters; (3) US item parameters for DIF-free items and Dutch item parameters (rescaled to the US metric) for DIF items; (4) Dutch item parameters for all items (rescaled to the US metric). Without anchoring to a common metric, CAT T-scores cannot be compared . When scores were rescaled to the US metric, mean differences in CAT T-scores based on US versus Dutch item parameters were negligible. However, 0.9-4.3% of the T-score differences were larger than 5 points (0.5 SD). The choice of item parameters can be consequential for individual patient scores. We recommend more studies of translated CATs to examine if strategies that allow for country-specific item parameters should be further investigated.
doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.011 pmid:33524487 fatcat:o7yf635yhvaj3ebch6d7h5pud4