A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2018; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
This paper challenges the assumptions and interpretative frameworks used by several prominent scholars of Metis history in Manitoba. The scholars were chosen for their prominence in their field and their particiation as expert witnesses in recent litigitation betwen the Crown and the Manitoba Metis. The article demonstrates that the scholarship (dubbed the "standard discourse") is repleat with apologists techniques meant to undermine the impact of government blundering, unsound historicaldoi:10.5663/aps.v6i2.28227 fatcat:iy5ibforg5aetg5glgveqyryxi