A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2016; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
Possible worlds, concrete or abstract as you like, are irrelevant to the truthmakers for modality-or so I shall argue in this paper. First, I present the neo-Humean picture of modality, and explain why those who accept it deny a common sense view of modality. Second, I present what I take to be the most pressing objection to the neo-Humean account, one that, I argue, applies equally well to any theory that grounds modality in possible worlds. Third, I present an alternative, propertiesbaseddoi:10.1007/s11098-009-9427-1 fatcat:fygl3zdvnjbbti3llkzkmffsoy