Specific Performance. Legal Consequences of Right of Specific Performance. Right of Personal Representative to Purchase Money in Option to Purchase

1909 Harvard Law Review  
Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid--seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non--commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal
more » ... out Early Journal Content at http://about.jstor.org/participate--jstor/individuals/early-journal--content. JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not--for--profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. HARVARD LAW REVIEW. HARVARD LAW REVIEW. and delivered wheat after banking hours, receiving a check which was dishonored when he presented it on his next visit to town about two weeks later. Meanwhile the buyer became insolvent and the defendant attached the wheat. The check would have been paid if presented before the insolvency, although the buyer had no deposit. In an action for conversion the plaintiff had a verdict and judgment. Held, that the judgment is not against the evidence. People's State Bank of Michigan Valley v. Brown, I03 Pac. 102 (Kan.). It is well settled that delivery of the goods by the seller under an agreement for a cash sale may constitute a waiver of the condition of payment and pass title to the buyer. Globe Milling Co. v. Minnesota Elevator Co.; 44 Minn. I53. The generally accepted rule is that such a waiver depends upon the intention of the seller as determined by the jury. Goslen v. Campbell, 88 Me. 450. Some courts treat unrestricted delivery as prima facie evidence of an intention to waive cash payment. Smith v. Lynes, 5 N. Y. 41. Others have held that such a delivery should be conclusive evidence of a waiver. Upton v. Sturbridge Cotton Mills, ii Mass. 446. See WILLISTON, SALES, ? 346. Logically this rule is correct, for delivery without payment is obviously inconsistent with a cash sale. Applying this rule to the facts of the principal case there was either an absolute delivery on credit or a conditional sale. If the formr, an action for conversion would not lie. If a conditional sale, it would be void against creditors of the buyer because unrecorded. GEN. STAT. KAN. (I897), c. I20, ? I3. Even under the generally accepted rule the decision seems an extreme one, for the authorities require that the seller shall assert his right to the goods within a "reasonable time." Smith v. Dennie, 23 Mass. 262.
doi:10.2307/1324593 fatcat:2nauo6ntt5aybfihzckwkjmms4