A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2018; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
– This paper compares student intra-team feedback to identify behaviours that differentiate high and low performing teams. Data from two universities' first-year engineering design courses was analysed and demonstrated that the ways in which students discussed high and low performing teams was similar. This paper discusses some of the issues with which low performing teams struggled. Both high and low performing teams experienced a lack of quality and quantity of communication, whereasdoi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.9621 fatcat:2souk53gl5dxdpuemx7qgeb7za