Surrealism Is Not an Alternative to Scientific Realism

Seungbae Park, Romanian Academy - Iasi Branch
2019 Logos & Episteme: An International Journal of Epistemology  
Surrealism holds that observables behave as if T were true, whereas scientific realism holds that T is true. Surrealism and scientific realism give different explanations of why T is empirically adequate. According to surrealism, T is empirically adequate because observables behave as if it were true. According to scientific realism, T is empirically adequate because it is true. I argue that the surrealist explanation merely clarifies the concept of empirical adequacy, whereas the realist
more » ... s the realist explanation makes an inductive inference about T. Therefore, the surrealist explanation is a conceptual one, whereas the realist explanation is an empirical one, and the former is not an alternative to the latter.
doi:10.5840/logos-episteme201910435 fatcat:zlvaynk42ffkvgzw5fsyydxbaq