Comparação entre cimentos resinosos e uma resina \"bulk fill\" na cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro - Análise de resistência adesiva e dureza [thesis]

Tamile Rocha da Silva Lobo
Lobo TLRS. Comparison between resin cements and a "bulk fill" resin composite on the luting of fiberglass-reinforced posts cementation -Bond strength and hardness analysis [thesis]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia; 2017. Versão Original This study compared the performance of four cementitious agents with different adhesive strategies for cementing fiberglass pins in root canals, through the adhesive strength test and evaluating the hardness at different depths.
more » ... this, 60 endodontically treated bovine roots were used. Rebilda Post 20 fiberglass pins were cemented according to the following protocols divided into the following groups: QM groups: dual self-etching adhesive Futurabond DC + resin cement Bifix QM; Group SE: Dual polymerization resin cement Bifix SE; Group RB: application of self-etching dual-polymerization adhesive Futurabond DC + resin Rebilda; Group XB: application of the self-etching adhesive for dual polymerization Futurabond DC + composite resin of the bulk fill type X-tra Base. The roots were cut into 1mm slices and separated into thirds, obtaining 2 specimens per third. Bond strength (n =10) and microhardness (n
doi:10.11606/t.23.2018.tde-12062018-092206 fatcat:mqeuvknwjze7tfv7kw4kj7edwm