A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2020; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
Global versus Local Weak-Indication Self-Timed Function Blocks - A Comparative Analysis
[article]
2016
arXiv
pre-print
This paper analyzes the merits and demerits of global weak-indication self-timed function blocks versus local weak-indication self-timed function blocks, implemented using a delay-insensitive data code and adhering to 4-phase return-to-zero handshaking. A self-timed ripple carry adder is considered as an example function block for the analysis. The analysis shows that while global weak-indication could help in optimizing the power, latency and area parameters, local weak-indication facilitates
arXiv:1603.07962v1
fatcat:dph6tnkv5ze3pdt6mtbggg4atm