Jurisdiction to Appoint Guardians of the Person

1907 Columbia Law Review  
Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid--seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non--commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal
more » ... out Early Journal Content at http://about.jstor.org/participate--jstor/individuals/early-journal--content. JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not--for--profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW. capital for the new corporation. It was held that the creation of treasury stock under the circumstances was not a legitimate corporate purpose. From the nature of the transaction the return of the stock could not be upheld as a gift, although it is recognized that gifts and bequests are valid methods by which a corporation may acquire its own stock. Riv . Nav. Co. v. Dawsons (Va. 1843) 3 Gratt I9; Cook, Stock ? 42, note. The decision exposes a not uncommon method of corporate organization in recent years and properly stamps it as illegitimate, Oiling et al. v. Wen?el et al. (1890) I33 ll. 264, although in a similar case the transaction was apparently not so accurately penetrated and characterized by the court. Lake Superior Iron Co. v. Drexel (1882) 90 N. Y. 87. In each case where the right of acquiring its own stock is involved the circumstances and purposes of the corporation must be examined. If the courts can find a legitimate corporate purpose that is advanced without injury to creditors, they do not hesitate to uphold the transaction. Whitaker v. Grummond (1888) 68 Mich. 249 and cases supra. But cf.
doi:10.2307/1109670 fatcat:74dpq7sp3vddtao2vxahrk5sxy