The Internet Archive has a preservation copy of this work in our general collections.
the discovery of some of these errors, which are in part mere misprints and in part due to an unfathomable mistake in the assumed molecular weight of octane. Fortunately, none of the conclusions of the paper is at all affected by the mistakes, because all of the octanes were equally affected by them. should read "5448, 5442, 54549 9444, 5439." read "5482, 5474, 5487, 54771 5472." CORRECTIOR. The last half of the sentence a t the foot of page 89 (January nynber of THIS JOURNAL) instead ofdoi:10.1021/ja02179a006 fatcat:ynptfbf6rzdptdcc7nbiu6xdvy