A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2017; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
A comparison of open and percutaneous techniques in the surgical treatment of tennis elbow
2004
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
We conducted a prospective, randomised, controlled trial of 45 patients (47 elbows), with tennis elbow, who underwent either a formal open release or a percutaneous tenotomy. All patients had pre-and post-operative assessment using the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring system. Both groups were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. Statistical analyses using the Mann-Whitney U test and repeated measured ANOVA showed significant improvements for patient satisfaction (p =
doi:10.1302/0301-620x.86b5.14469
pmid:15274267
fatcat:owwcevpqyzba3heo2egfek3exu