A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2017; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
Reflections on a Prominent Argument in the Wittgenstein Debate
Philosophy and Literature
Does the way authors treat their own works tell us something about how these works are to be understood? not necessarily. but then a standard argument against the "new Wittgenstein" comes under question. The argument is: the undogmatic interpretation of Wittgenstein's Tractatus cannot be correct, since Wittgenstein himself later treats it as a work that holds certain positions. my response is: the argument is only correct if the answer to four specific questions is "yes." The main purpose ofdoi:10.1353/phl.2013.0026 fatcat:dc5v5kvk4bcd7ddslmyzlvflpa