Detecting argument selection defects

Andrew Rice, Edward Aftandilian, Ciera Jaspan, Emily Johnston, Michael Pradel, Yulissa Arroyo-Paredes
2017 Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages  
Identifier names are often used by developers to convey additional information about the meaning of a program over and above the semantics of the programming language itself. We present an algorithm that uses this information to detect argument selection defects, in which the programmer has chosen the wrong argument to a method call in Java programs. We evaluate our algorithm at Google on 200 million lines of internal code and 10 million lines of predominantly open-source external code and find
more » ... defects even in large, mature projects such as OpenJDK, ASM, and the MySQL JDBC. The precision and recall of the algorithm vary depending on a sensitivity threshold. Higher thresholds increase precision, giving a true positive rate of 85%, reporting 459 true positives and 78 false positives. Lower thresholds increase recall but lower the true positive rate, reporting 2,060 true positives and 1,207 false positives. We show that this is an order of magnitude improvement on previous approaches. By analyzing the defects found, we are able to quantify best practice advice for API design and show that the probability of an argument selection defect increases markedly when methods have more than five arguments.
doi:10.1145/3133928 dblp:journals/pacmpl/RiceAJJPA17 fatcat:aa5zbdndjjecnailq32fudpewy