A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2020; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
Complex Cases and Legitimation Inference: Extending the Toulmin Model to Deliberative Argument in Controversy
[chapter]
Arguing on the Toulmin Model
A warrant may be grounded in personal testimony, technical method, or public consensus. The justified choice of a field, in authorizing the warrant and providing further extension of support constitutes a legitimation inference. Complex cases evolve when there are a surplus of good reasons as potential support for a claim, and a choice must be made either to select a single ground for the claim or to advance independently valid reasons, differentially grounded, as support. Complex cases enter
doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5_4
dblp:series/argulib/Goodnight06
fatcat:l7saxodt3vbtrh7tbu4pfcvaay