Predictive Value of Complete Blood Count Inflammatory Parameters for Epithelial Ovarian Cancers in Women During Reproductive Period

Hilal Korkmaz, Mustafa Akşar, Halis Doğukan Özkan, Vakkas Korkmaz, Nurettin Boran
2021 Acta Oncologica Turcica  
Comparison of predictive values of complete blood count inflammatory parameters and serum CA-125 levels in the differential diagnosis of patients with epithelial ovarian tumor (EOTs) diagnosed in the reproductive period. Materials: In this study, 105 women patients in the reproductive period were retrospectively analyzed. The patients included were examined in terms of clinical, laboratory and pathological features. Results: The mean age of the patients was 41.5 ± 8.6 years and BMI was 28.6 ±
more » ... 8 kg/m2. Of the whole study population, 54 (51.5%) were benign EOTs, 18 (17.1%) were borderline EOTs and 33 (31.4%) were malignant EOTs. When comparing these three tumor groups, a significant difference was found in terms of serum CA-125 [14.7 U/mL (2.7-238.6) vs 60.2 U/mL (7.8 -557) vs 416.5 U/mL (2.4-7695), p<0.001, respectively], platelet count [294 x103/ μL (133-744) vs 303, x103/ μL (160-468) vs 383 x103/ μL (128-725), p = 0.018, respectively], neutrophil count [4.2, x103/ μL (1.9 -8.9) vs 4.9 x103/ μL (2.6-10.9) vs 5.1 x103/ μL (2.2 -10.7), p = 0.012], neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) [2.1 (0.1-8.2) vs 2.6 (1.2 -5.9) vs 3.1 (1-6.8), p = 0.021, respectively] and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) [154.4 (82.1-658.4) vs 168.1 (91.1-377.8) vs 201.5 (29.6-499.2), p = 0.008, respectively] values. In the ROC analyses, serum CA-125 levels (AUC= 0.818, p <0.001), platelet count (AUC= 0.673, p = 0.005) and PLR (AUC= 0.690, p = 0.002) values significantly predicted malignant EOTs. Conclusion: Preoperative platelet count, neutrophil count and PLR predict epithelial ovarian cancers significantly. However, diagnostic predictive values of all three parameters are lower than CA-125. Therefore, CA-125 is still the most valuable serum biochemical marker that can be used in the preoperative differential diagnosis of EOTs.
doi:10.5505/aot.2021.30922 fatcat:weeoayllt5e3hiaz6w6zsdpijy