Omar Ayedh Abdullah Amran, Hassan A. Al-Shamahy, Ahmed Mohamed Al Hadad, Bushra Mohammed Jaadan
2019 Universal Journal of Pharmaceutical Research  
The United Nations considers the situation in Yemen to be the worst humanitarian crisis in the world. In the midst of this, the fastest-spreading viral infection among HD patients was recorded. Therefore, this cohort study based in HD unit was conducted in Dhamar Hospital to estimate the outbreak of hepatitis B and C viruses among dialysis patients during the dialysis crisis in Yemen. All the patients who continuous go through hemodialysis from January 2018 to December 2018 and they were free
more » ... nd they were free from HBV/HCV infections at the start of the study (January 2018) were included. Patients who were discontinued from dialysis before the end of the year due to death or relocation were excluded from the study. Patients were tested for anti-HCV antibodies and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at study start (January 2018) then at the end of the follow up (December 2018). The individual's data were collected in a pre-designed questionnaire including; demographic data of HD frequency, and laboratory results. The study included 202 patients, 20 (9.9%), 18 (8.9%) and 6 (2.97%) were found to be infected with HCV, HBV and Co-HBV/HCV infection respectively. There was significant association between rise of HCV rate and younger patient age, and high frequency of dialysis. In conclusion, the prevalence of HBV and HCV infection and HBV / HCV infection in hemodialysis patients in our surroundings one year after HD was extremely common and lead to disaster for HD patients. This catastrophe is due to the lack or limited availability of materials and tools for dialysis and laboratory materials for virus tests due to the unfair siege on Yemen from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and the closure of Sana'a airport, which is the only entrance to medicines. Peer Review History: UJPR follows the most transparent and toughest 'Advanced OPEN peer review' system. The identity of the authors and, reviewers will be known to each other. This transparent process will help to eradicate any possible malicious/purposeful interference by any person (publishing staff, reviewer, editor, author, etc) during peer review. As a result of this unique system, all reviewers will get their due recognition and respect, once their names are published in the papers. We expect that, by publishing peer review reports with published papers, will be helpful to many authors for drafting their article according to the specifications. Auhors will remove any error of their article and they will improve their article(s) according to the previous reports displayed with published article(s). The main purpose of it is 'to improve the quality of a candidate manuscript'. Our reviewers check the 'strength and weakness of a manuscript honestly'. There will increase in the perfection, and transparency. Received file Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 5.5/10 Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10 Reviewer(s) detail: Name: Dr. Mohammed Sadeg Abdullah Al-Awar Affiliation: Physiology & Histopathology Queen Arwa University and Amran University, Yemen E-mail: momed.sadeg@gmail.com Name: Dr. Heba-Tallah Ahmed Mohamed Moustafa Affiliation: Heliopolis University Cairo, Egypt E-mail: anasweety2003@yahoo.com Comments of reviewer(s):
doi:10.22270/ujpr.v4i5.311 fatcat:gxsati4r6fbmbiau4hn5silkom