Patient and physician shared decision making behaviors in oncology: Evidence on adequate measurement properties of the iSHARE questionnaires [article]

Hanna Bomhof-Roordink, Anne M. Stiggelbout, Fania R. Gärtner, Johanneke E.A. Portielje, Cor D. de Kroon, Koen C.M.J. Peeters, Karen J. Neelis, Jan Willem T. Dekker, Trudy van der Weijden, Arwen H. Pieterse, for the iSHARE study group
2021 medRxiv   pre-print
AbstractObjectivesWe have developed two questionnaires to assess the shared decision making (SDM) process in oncology; the iSHAREpatient and iSHAREphysician. In this study, we aimed to determine: scores, construct validity, test-retest agreement (iSHAREpatient), and inter-rater (iSHAREpatient-iSHAREphysician) agreement.MethodsPhysicians from seven Dutch hospitals recruited cancer patients, and completed the iSHAREphysician and SDM-Questionnaire–physician version. Their patients completed the:
more » ... ts completed the: iSHAREpatient, 9-item SDM-Questionnaire, Decisional Conflict Scale, Combined Outcome Measure for Risk communication And treatment Decision making Effectiveness, and Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions. We formulated, respectively, one (iSHAREphysician) and 10 (iSHAREpatient) a priori hypotheses regarding correlations between the iSHARE questionnaires and questionnaires assessing related constructs. To assess test-retest agreement patients completed the iSHAREpatient again 1-2 weeks later.ResultsIn total, 151 treatment decision making processes with unique patients were rated. Dimension and total iSHARE scores were high both in patients and physicians. The hypothesis on the iSHAREphysician and 9/10 hypotheses on the iSHAREpatient were confirmed. Test-retest and inter-rater agreement were >.60 for most items.ConclusionsThe iSHARE questionnaires show high scores, have good construct validity, substantial test-retest agreement, and moderate inter-rater agreement.Practice implicationsResults from the iSHARE questionnaires can inform both physician- and patient-directed efforts to improve SDM in clinical practice.
doi:10.1101/2021.02.12.21251610 fatcat:andacm5xcnanvh7qvo2y3rnllq