Stability and instability of hydromagnetic Taylor–Couette flows

Günther Rüdiger, Marcus Gellert, Rainer Hollerbach, Manfred Schultz, Frank Stefani
2018 Physics reports  
Decades ago S. Lundquist, S. Chandrasekhar, P.H. Roberts and R. J. Tayler first posed questions about the stability of Taylor-Couette flows of conducting material under the influence of large-scale magnetic fields. These and many new questions can now be answered numerically where the nonlinear simulations even provide the instability-induced values of several transport coefficients. The cylindrical containers are axially unbounded and penetrated by magnetic background fields with axial and/or
more » ... zimuthal components. The influence of the magnetic Prandtl number Pm on the onset of the instabilities is shown to be substantial. The potential flow subject to axial fields becomes unstable against axisymmetric perturbations for a certain supercritical value of the averaged Reynolds number Rm=√(Re· Rm) (with Re the Reynolds number of rotation, Rm its magnetic Reynolds number). Rotation profiles as flat as the quasi-Keplerian rotation law scale similarly but only for Pm≫ 1 while for Pm≪ 1 the instability instead sets in for supercritical Rm at an optimal value of the magnetic field. Among the considered instabilities of azimuthal fields, those of the Chandrasekhar-type, where the background field and the background flow have identical radial profiles, are particularly interesting. They are unstable against nonaxisymmetric perturbations if at least one of the diffusivities is non-zero. For Pm≪ 1 the onset of the instability scales with Re while it scales with Rm for Pm≫ 1. - Even superrotation can be destabilized by azimuthal and current-free magnetic fields; this recently discovered nonaxisymmetric instability is of a double-diffusive character, thus excluding Pm= 1. It scales with Re for Pm→ 0 and with Rm for Pm→∞.
doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.02.006 fatcat:72wgsbnlmvhd3jg2didfyq3ebi