Microarchitecture evaluation with physical planning

Jason Cong, Ashok Jagannathan, Glenn Reinman, Michail Romesis
2003 Proceedings of the 40th conference on Design automation - DAC '03  
Conventionally, microarchitecture designs are mainly guided by the maximum throughput (measured as IPC) and fail to evaluate the impact of architectural decisions on the physical design, and in particular, the impact on the interconnects. In this paper, we propose MEVA, a system to consider both IPC and cycle time in the design space search for a given microarchitectural design. MEVA can consider a variety of user-specified architectural alternatives that trade IPC and cycle time in the design,
more » ... and performs accurate floorplanning and simulation to fully evaluate each alternative. The resulting solution will maximize the benefit from both IPC and cycle time to provide a better solution than a design space exploration based simply on IPC or cycle time alone. For a sample architectural design, we are able to search a space of 32 architectural configurations with physical planning in less than 2 hours to find a processor configuration that, in terms of BIPS, outperforms the configuration with the best IPC performance by 14%, and the configuration with the fastest clock by 27%. This initial exploration only considers the boundary cases of a much larger design space, but still features substantial IPC and cycle time variation.
doi:10.1145/775832.775843 dblp:conf/dac/CongJRR03 fatcat:e6upnsvz3jepfiovzgv5qol2tu