Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. William P. Jett v. The Commonwealth of Virginia

1868 The American Law Register (1852-1891)  
Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid--seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non--commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal
more » ... out Early Journal Content at JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not--for--profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact JETT v. THE COMMONWEALTH. JETT v. THE COMMONWEALTH. usefulness and value. Whether it was in condition to be given to the world by another hand, the present writer is ignorant. As a writer, Professor DEAN was characterized by industry, accuracy, and great carefulness in the examination of authorities, and by clearness and unambitious simplicity of language in expressing his conclusions. He was not a great author, nor a great lawyer, but he held a fair rank in that honorable class of the profession who are learned, prudent, and trusty counsellors in the affairs of men. The proprieties of the occasion will be sufficiently served in the present notice, by adding, that Professor DEAN was marked by ingenuousness and sincerity, by freedom from all obtrusive self-assertion, by extraordinary kindness of heart, and simplicity of manners. He was genial and confiding in his social relations, earnest and faithful in the discharge of all the duties of his various positions. His personal character was unblemished by any vices. He was constantly putting forth influences for good upon all classes of the community, and especially upon young men, who, at the threshold of active life, were in need of direction, encouragement, support, and instruction. By the great number of this class with whom he was in one way or another connected, and by a very large circle of personal friends, his death is felt as a great loss. J. T. M. RECENT AMERICAN DECISIONS. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. WILLIAM P. JETT v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. Passing a counterfeit note of a national bank is an offence for which an indictment will lie in a state court, under the laws of the state. There is nothing in the relations of the state and Federal courts or in the nature of the jurisdiction itself, which makes the jurisdiction of the United States courts to punish the act of passing counterfeit national bank notes, necessarily exclusive. Nor is it made so by Act of Congress. The concurrent jurisdiction of the national and state courts considered and discussed. Per JOYNES, J.
doi:10.2307/3303186 fatcat:kihihip625hu3jmctj7rk6qy3u