A Budget-Impact and Cost-Effectiveness Model for Second-Line Treatment of Major Depression

Daniel C. Malone
2007 Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy  
rESuLTS: Second-line remission rates were 20.4% for venlafaxine Xr, 16.9% for sertraline, 16.4% for escitalopram, 15.1% for generic SSrIs (weighted average), and 13.6% for paroxetine Cr. Pharmacy costs ranged from $163 for generic SSrIs to $319 for venlafaxine Xr. Total cost per patient achieving remission was $14,275 for venlafaxine Xr, followed by $16,100 for escitalopram. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICEr) for venlafaxine Xr compared with generic SSrIs was $2,073 per patient
more » ... eving remission, followed by escitalopram with an ICEr of $3,566. The model was most sensitive to nonpharmacy costs. ConCLuSIon: This analysis suggests that second-line treatment of depression with venlafaxine Xr may result in more patients achieving remission, with an ICEr that is favorable to other therapies. kEyWorDS: SSrI, SnrI (serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor), Antidepressants, Cost-effectiveness model, Major depressive disorder, Budget-impact model, venlafaxine extended release (Xr), Managed care J Manag Care Pharm. 2007;13(6)(suppl S-a):S8-S18 JMCP Supplement to Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy S17 remission of their depression. This suggests that venlafaxine XR may be a cost-effective strategy with a favorable ICER for the second-line treatment of MDD.
doi:10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.s6-a.8 fatcat:b5pvws2h7famnjjbvpmyp5tcvu