Intentional Relations

Mark Sainsbury
2017 Argumenta   unpublished
Thinking about Obama and thinking about Pegasus seem to be the same kind of thing: both are cases of thinking about something. But they also seem to be different kinds of thing, in that one is relational and the other not. This paper aims to show a way out of the impasse by distinguishing varieties of relationality, concluding that what matters is the two-term relational nature of all intentional states, regardless of whether or not the representations they involve have referents.
fatcat:fknlbuhf2jdm7a2ex3nggkznwm