Comparison of Pedicle Screw Fixation With or Without Cement Augmentation Combined With Single-segment Isthmic Spondylolisthesis in Osteoporotic Spine [post]

Jian-cheng Peng, Hui-zhi Guo, Chen-guang Zhan, Hua-sheng Huang, Yan-huai Ma, Shun-cong Zhang, Yue-rong Xu, Guo-ye Mo, Yong-chao Tang
2021 unpublished
PurposeThis study aims to investigate the necessity of cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation in single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis.MethodFifty-nine cases were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-three cases were in the polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw (PMMA-PS) group, and the other 26 cases were in the conventional pedicle screw (CPS) group. Evaluation data included operation time, intraoperative blood loss,hospitalization cost, hospitalization days, rates
more » ... fusion, screw loosening, bone cement leakage, visual analog scores (VAS) , Oswestry disability index (ODI) , Lumbar Lordosis(LL), Pelvic Tilt(PT) and Sacral Slope(SS). ResultsThe operation time and blood loss in the CPS group decreased significantly compared to the PMMA-PS group (P < 0.05). The average hospitalization cost of the PMMA group was significantly higher than that of the CPS group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference for the average hospital stay between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The initial and the last follow-up postoperative VAS and ODI improved significantly in the two groups (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in VAS and ODI at each time point between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The last postoperative spine-pelvic parameters were significantly improved compared with preoperation (P < 0.05). In the PMMA-PS group, the fusion rate was 100%. The fusion rate was 96.15% in the CPS group. No significant difference was found between the two groups for the fusion rate (P > 0.05). Nine cases in the PMMA-PS group had bone cement leakage (27.27%). There was not screw loosening in the PMMA-PS group. There were 2 cases of screw loosening in the CPS group. There were no significant differences in screw loosening, postoperative adjacent segment fractures, postoperative infection or postoperative revision between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe use of PMMA-PS on a regular basis is not recommended for posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis.
doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1051822/v1 fatcat:yfss7js425b4tjkvuxgauq4wni