A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2016; you can also visit <a rel="external noopener" href="http://web.mit.edu/tger/www/papers/Observing%20and%20Intervening%20(Meder,%20Gerstenberg,%20Hagmayer,%20Waldmann,%202010).pdf">the original URL</a>. The file type is <code>application/pdf</code>.
<i title="Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.">
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/container/louogk4dyjg4lixm5ov2njc2oi" style="color: black;">Open Psychology Journal</a>
Recently, a number of rational theories have been put forward which provide a coherent formal framework for modeling different types of causal inferences, such as prediction, diagnosis, and action planning. A hallmark of these theories is their capacity to simultaneously express probability distributions under observational and interventional scenarios, thereby rendering it possible to derive precise predictions about interventions ("doing") from passive observations ("seeing"). In Part 1 of<span class="external-identifiers"> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350101003010119">doi:10.2174/1874350101003010119</a> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/release/2almtly24vbb5dy3dsvrw7n4im">fatcat:2almtly24vbb5dy3dsvrw7n4im</a> </span>
more »... paper we discuss different modeling approaches for formally representing interventions and review the empirical evidence on how humans draw causal inferences based on observations or interventions. We contrast deterministic interventions with imperfect actions yielding unreliable or unknown outcomes. In Part 2, we discuss alternative strategies for making interventional decisions when the causal structure is unknown to the agent. A Bayesian approach of rational causal inference, which aims to infer the structure and its parameters from the available data, provides the benchmark model. This account is contrasted with a heuristic approach which knows categories of causes and effects but neglects further structural information. The results of computer simulations show that despite its computational parsimony the heuristic approach achieves very good performance compared to the Bayesian model.
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160721171611/http://web.mit.edu/tger/www/papers/Observing%20and%20Intervening%20(Meder,%20Gerstenberg,%20Hagmayer,%20Waldmann,%202010).pdf" title="fulltext PDF download" data-goatcounter-click="serp-fulltext" data-goatcounter-title="serp-fulltext"> <button class="ui simple right pointing dropdown compact black labeled icon button serp-button"> <i class="icon ia-icon"></i> Web Archive [PDF] <div class="menu fulltext-thumbnail"> <img src="https://blobs.fatcat.wiki/thumbnail/pdf/ab/13/ab13ca69c5dab13cc01dbc2abeb71b4758acfca5.180px.jpg" alt="fulltext thumbnail" loading="lazy"> </div> </button> </a> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350101003010119"> <button class="ui left aligned compact blue labeled icon button serp-button"> <i class="external alternate icon"></i> Publisher / doi.org </button> </a>