Development and validation of logistic regression models for thrombocytopenia and investigation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients

Arun Kumar Verma
2005
PURPOSE Thrombocytopenia, which is common in critically ill patients, can increase bleeding risk or be a clinical sign of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). This investigation: 1) estimated the incidence of, identified explanatory variables at and after admission, and evaluated the performance of predictive models for thrombocytopenia, and 2) estimated the incidence of HIT, and evaluated the predictive performance of a heparin-PF4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for diagnosing
more » ... . METHODS Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 150 x 10⁹/L; < 100 x 10⁹/L) for 792 patients admitted to a community hospital combined intensive and coronary care unit (ICU/CCU). ICU/CCU and ICU admission and post-admission models were developed and validated internally using bootstrap re-sampling techniques. Admission models were validated externally using data from 572 ICU patients admitted to a different hospital. HIT diagnosis was based on clinical criteria and a positive ¹⁴C-serotonin release assay (SRA). Specificity and predictive values for the ELISA were estimated in patients who met the clinical criteria for HIT. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-two (17.3%) ICU/CCU patients developed thrombocytopenia (two consecutive counts < 150 x 10⁹/L). Specific predictors were consistently identified for the admission models (APACHE II score, admission diagnosis, and admission platelet count) and post-admission models (admission diagnosis, APACHE II score, admission platelet count, fresh frozen plasma and packed red blood cell transfusions). These models demonstrated excellent discriminating ability that was supported by internal validation. On external validation, the admission models demonstrated acceptable to excellent discriminating ability, but there was a tendency to over-predict at higher probabilities. HIT incidence was 0.39% (95% CI, 0.01% to 2.1%). Positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) ofthe ELISA were 10% and 10 [...]
doi:10.14288/1.0092279 fatcat:5n7egf3vz5evbj2zpngnvdsrsa