A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2019; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
A quantitative comparison of the cost of employing EOR-coupled CCS supplemented with secondary DSF storage for two large CO2 point sources
2011
Energy Procedia
This paper explores the impact of the temporally dynamic demand for CO 2 for CCS-coupled EOR by evaluating the variable demand for new (i.e., non-recycled) anthropogenic CO 2 within EOR projects and the extent to which EOR-coupled CCS is compatible with the need for baseload CO 2 storage options for large anthropogenic point sources. A profile of CO 2 demand over an assumed EOR project lifetime is applied across two different storage scenarios to illustrate the differences in cost associated
doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.128
fatcat:dpy4dikvvjcklcwdme3mpqeama