A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2018; you can also visit <a rel="external noopener" href="https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/34818042/KaplowKominers.PublicChoice.QV13.n16.pdf?sequence=1">the original URL</a>. The file type is <code>application/pdf</code>.
<i title="Springer Nature">
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/container/x4rtmbpo4zdmxcmmih7fejvxh4" style="color: black;">Public Choice</a>
Who will vote quadratically in large-N elections under quadratic voting (QV)? First, who will vote? Although the core QV literature assumes that everyone votes, turnout is endogenous. Drawing on other work, we consider the representativeness of endogenously determined turnout under QV. Second, who will vote quadratically? Conditional on turning out, we examine reasons that, in large-N elections, the number of votes that an individual casts may deviate substantially from that under pure,<span class="external-identifiers"> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017-0412-5">doi:10.1007/s11127-017-0412-5</a> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/release/vbhrinybzjei5hckr2xlhhf3w4">fatcat:vbhrinybzjei5hckr2xlhhf3w4</a> </span>
more »... QV equilibrium play. Because turnout itself is driven by other factors, the same determinants may influence how voters who do turn out choose the quantity of votes to cast. Independently, the number of votes actually cast may deviate dramatically from pure QV predictions because of the complex and refined nature of equilibrium play. Most plausibly, voting behavior and outcomes would be determined predominately by social and psychological forces, would thereby exhibit few of the features emphasized in the analysis of hyper-rational equilibrium play, and would have consequential properties that require a different research agenda to bring into focus. Some of our analysis also has implications for voting behavior under other procedures, including one person, one vote.
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20180722065429/https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/34818042/KaplowKominers.PublicChoice.QV13.n16.pdf?sequence=1" title="fulltext PDF download" data-goatcounter-click="serp-fulltext" data-goatcounter-title="serp-fulltext"> <button class="ui simple right pointing dropdown compact black labeled icon button serp-button"> <i class="icon ia-icon"></i> Web Archive [PDF] <div class="menu fulltext-thumbnail"> <img src="https://blobs.fatcat.wiki/thumbnail/pdf/13/bc/13bc1eb59267643902237982cdbb0e55157c2cc8.180px.jpg" alt="fulltext thumbnail" loading="lazy"> </div> </button> </a> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017-0412-5"> <button class="ui left aligned compact blue labeled icon button serp-button"> <i class="external alternate icon"></i> springer.com </button> </a>