Experimental Research on the Measurement of High-Pressure Microflow Based on Momentum Principle
Hua Xia, Fuqiang Luo, Zhong Wang, Jianguo Wang
2021
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
The fuel injector is an important component of the diesel engine. It has a great influence on the atomization of diesel fuel injection, the formation of mixed gas, and combustion emissions. Due to the current nozzle structure, processing level, and the internal hydraulic conditions of each nozzle, there are certain differences between the injection rules of each hole, and there are few methods to quantify the quality of the injector using mathematical methods in engineering. Based on the
more »
... le of spray momentum, this paper measures the injection characteristics of each hole of four five-hole pressureless chamber injectors of the same model and analyzes the circulating fuel injection volume and flow coefficient of each injector and each hole under different working conditions. It is proposed to evaluate the quality of the injector with the average circulating fuel injection volume, average flow coefficient, and nonuniformity as indicators. The test results are as follows: there are differences in the circulating fuel injection volume and flow coefficient between each hole of the same fuel injector. With the increase of the fuel injection pump speed, the average circulating fuel injection volume of each hole differs by 2.8%–47.5%, and the average flow coefficient differs by 3.7%–30%; as the fuel injection volume increases, the average circulating fuel injection volume of each injector differs 1.8%–36%, and the average flow coefficient difference is 2.5%–28.7%. The circulating fuel injection volume and flow coefficient of different fuel injectors of the same model are different. With the increase of the fuel injection pump speed, the average circulating fuel injection volume of each injector differs by 3.5%–9.6%, and the average flow coefficient differs by 1.4%–5.7%; as the fuel injection volume increases, the average circulating fuel injection volume of each injector differs 0.3%–5.5%, and the average flow coefficient difference is 2.8–4.2%. The relative flow coefficient of each hole differs from 0 to 0.02, and the nonuniformity differs from 1.8% to 16.9%. The relative circulating fuel injection amount of each hole differs from 0.02 to 0.1, and the nonuniformity differs from 1.1% to 6.9%. The relative flow coefficient of each hole and its nonuniformity is smaller than the relative circulating fuel injection volume of each hole and its nonuniformity.
doi:10.1155/2021/2393799
fatcat:abqv7wlkr5epnft76fc7cjg66y