Practical Model Selection for Prospective Virtual Screening

Shengchao Liu, Moayad Alnammi, Spencer S. Ericksen, Andrew F. Voter, Gene E. Ananiev, James L. Keck, F. Michael Hoffmann, Scott A. Wildman, Anthony Gitter
2018 Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling  
Virtual (computational) high-throughput screening provides a strategy for prioritizing compounds for experimental screens, but the choice of virtual screening algorithm depends on the data set and evaluation strategy. We consider a wide range of ligand-based machine learning and docking-based approaches for virtual screening on two protein-protein interactions, PriA-SSB and RMI-FANCM, and present a strategy for choosing which algorithm is best for prospective compound prioritization. Our
more » ... w identifies a random forest as the best algorithm for these targets over more sophisticated neural network-based models. The top 250 predictions from our selected random forest recover 37 of the 54 active compounds from a library of 22,434 new molecules assayed on PriA-SSB. We show that virtual screening methods that perform well on public data sets and synthetic benchmarks, like multi-task neural networks, may not always translate to prospective screening performance on a specific assay of interest.
doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00363 pmid:30500183 pmcid:PMC6351977 fatcat:4cqp6nqkfrf3hdetp42rmwgaey