A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2018; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
Methods 71 412 women from the French E3N cohort returned in 2005 a questionnaire containing the CES-D scale. An interview study was carried out on a random sample of 204 participants to examine different hypotheses for the MD mechanism. The prevalence of DS was estimated with different methods for handling MD: complete cases analysis, single imputation, multiple imputation from CES-D items with or without covariates under missing at random (MAR) and missing not at random (MNAR) assumptions.doi:10.1136/jech.2011.142976m.68 fatcat:owqkzmoy6zai7mxzlvitjmvez4