Reply on RC2 [peer_review]

Concetta Di Mauro
2021 unpublished
We would like to thank referee for the careful reading and the very useful comments. Below we address the referee comments and explain how the manuscript will be updated. Comments of the referee are in italic and bold font. This is a highly technical manuscript focused on assimilation of many different data sources using multiple techniques to predict flood extent and depth. I think this is an interesting study, but I overall I think it needs major improvements before it can be published. The
more » ... be published. The science is sound and interesting, but the manuscript could be clarified and re-vised throughout to make this easier for the reader to understand. I summarize my major comments and minor comments below. We will clarify the manuscript as suggested by the referee. Interactive comment Printer-friendly version Discussion paper
doi:10.5194/hess-2020-403-ac4 fatcat:7yogqgo735enheozigmrqxbpnm