K. Kravchuk, V. Andreieva, T. Kravchuk
2019 Zenodo  
The training process of volleyball players requires a sound approach to the planning of sports preparedness, the use of equipment to obtain information on the activities of athletes. Modeling methods, using modern characteristics, are one of the effective approaches that allow us to optimize the training processes of volleyball players. Models of sportsmanship, models of athletes' preparedness and competitive activity at different stages of the training cycle are the most effective criteria for
more » ... ective criteria for evaluating operational, current and stage indicators and comparing them with the appropriate ones. Volleyball is such a kind of sport that requires high levels of morphofunctionality for players. Particularly important is the development of volleyball players' opportunities at the first stages of training. Defining reference model characteristics (parameters) is an integral part of athletes' overall training. The article presents a number of model characteristics which are the most informative indicators for building a model of morphofunctional training for volleyball players. Аrticle's purpose is to study, analyze and summarize theoretical and methodological foundations of volleyball players' morphofunctional readiness model characteristics. Methodology. Theoretical analysis, generalization, comparison were applied for the most meaningful results of the study and their interpretation. Also general scientific principles as the ascent from the abstract to the concrete and cognitive principle were used. Scientific novelty. The theoretical aspects of the model characteristics of the volleyball players' morphofunctional preparedness needed to build the model have been found, defined and generalized. Conclusions. Effective management of the training process and different aspects of athletes' preparedness requires the construction of models. The model of athletes' preparedness is developed on the basis of the evaluation of model characteristics (indicators).
doi:10.5281/zenodo.3475768 fatcat:znbrizulivfoljiyft6goq5mve