Pre-commercial thinning in naturally regenerated stands of European beech is often expensive and must be justified by improved development of the remaining crop. Based on a field experiment established in two 14-year-old naturally regenerated beech stands in Denmark, we investigated some effects of pre-commercial thinning and pruning on future crop tree growth and stem quality. The treatments included (1) no thinning, (2) moderate to heavy strip thinning, with or without subsequent selective

more »

... nning, and (3) extremely heavy strip thinning in two perpendicular directions (checkerboard thinning), with or without subsequent selective thinning and with or without pruning. The resulting residual stand densities ranged from 10 5 to only 200 ha −1 . Treatment effects were evaluated on one potential future crop tree for every 100 m 2 . Potential future crop trees were selected 32 years after germination based on spatial distribution, growth potential and stem quality. Total crop tree height was unaffected by strip thinning, but reduced by checkerboard thinning. Stem diameter at 1.30 m above ground level increased with decreasing stand density but, for checkerboard thinning, was reduced by pruning. The lower live branch was located at a lower position with heavy strip thinning and with checkerboard thinning without pruning. The frequency of crop trees with a forked stem was largest with checkerboard thinning and these forks were located at a lower position. Stem tilt and stem bend (stem straightness) were essentially unaffected by thinning practice. However, pruned trees tilted less and had straighter stems. The initial formation of epicormic branches on crop trees was unrelated to thinning and pruning practice, but crop trees that had been pruned for these were less prone to subsequently develop epicormic branches. In summary, moderate to heavy pre-commercial thinning had no effect on stem quality, while extremely heavy thinning without pruning resulted in unacceptably low stem quality. The no-thinning option resulted in acceptable growth and stem quality of the crop trees and this remains a viable management alternative for young beech.