A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2019; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
In this paper we apply the information state update (ISU) machinery to tracking and understanding the argumentative behaviour of participants in a parliamentary debate in order to predict its outcome. We propose to use the ISU approach to model the arguments of the debaters and the support/attack links between them as part of the formal representations of a participant's information state. We first consider the identification of claims and evidence relations to their premises as an argumentdoi:10.1007/978-3-319-46218-9_3 fatcat:jkyknrf3gff2xmiz7xe3jijlui