A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2019; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
This lack of precise security assessment is obviously a barrier to a widespread use of these signatures and a reason for preferring other constructions, such as the ones relying on q-type assumptions. ... In this paper, we study more thoroughly the security of these signatures and prove that it actually relies, for both constructions, on simple variants of the SDH assumption, assuming a slight modification ... Moreover, it also cancels the full randomizability of the signature since m cannot itself be randomized. But the purpose of m , in the security proof, is to provide a degree of freedom. ...doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76953-0_17 fatcat:s7tvrtzxx5bxfbipanfxmas6qe
Current treatment should be reassessed  . ... most lik e ly every tumor has a unique gene signature. ... T w o phase I I I randomiz e d stu dies, addressing respectiv e ly the qu estions of the role of u pf ront therapy and of the timing of nephrectomy , are cu rrently ong oing in Eu rope [ 4 8 ] . ...doi:10.5167/uzh-55932 fatcat:rmnytbs34jg2dbeubzxf6art5u