Filters








53 Hits in 1.1 sec

Ranking Ontologies with AKTiveRank [chapter]

Harith Alani, Christopher Brewster, Nigel Shadbolt
2006 Lecture Notes in Computer Science  
This paper presents AKTiveRank, a prototype system for ranking ontologies based on a number of structural metrics.  ...  Jones and Alani are experimenting with ranking ontologies based on a tf/idf comparison of each potentially relevant ontology with an automatically gathered corpus that describes the domain of interest  ...  AKTiveRank could be integrated with other, different, ranking systems to include additional ranking criteria, such as user ratings or content coverage.  ... 
doi:10.1007/11926078_1 fatcat:5rxj6e6vovanddldcjbz3xcjpi

Ontology ranking based on the analysis of concept structures

Harith Alani, Christopher Brewster
2005 Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Knowledge capture - K-CAP '05  
AKTiveRank uses as input the search terms provided by a knowledge engineer and, using the output of an ontology search engine, ranks the ontologies.  ...  We apply a number of classical metrics in an attempt to investigate their appropriateness for ranking ontologies, and compare the results with a questionnaire-based human study.  ...  From the results in figure 3 , it can be seen that the according to AKTiveRank, ontology i ranked number 1 (with a score of 0.78), followed by f (0.69), and k (0.684).  ... 
doi:10.1145/1088622.1088633 dblp:conf/kcap/AlaniB05 fatcat:feen23remzfnlmhwcq4nyf2beu

Ranking Ontologies Using Verified Entities to Facilitate Federated Queries

Neda Alipanah, Piyush Srivastava, Pallabi Parveen, Bhavani Thuraisingham
2010 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology  
Since ontologies for a same domain usually overlap, we aim to rank ontologies based on the commonality of overlapping entities and distance between each pair of ontologies.  ...  Finally, we compare our approach with an existing approach and show effectiveness of our EBD approach.  ...  In the AktiveRank method, we use all entities of original ontology as keywords for ranking purpose, since AktiveRank relies only on a list of keywords to rank ontologies.  ... 
doi:10.1109/wi-iat.2010.147 dblp:conf/webi/AlipanahSPT10 fatcat:sbos4iit5nhc5pirxuu4wg5bjq

Metrics for Ranking Ontologies

Harith Alani, Christopher Brewster
2006 The Web Conference  
In this paper we present AKTiveRank, a prototype system for ranking ontologies based on the analysis of their structures.  ...  The need for ontology ranking techniques is becoming crucial as the number of ontologies available for reuse is continuing to grow.  ...  Daniela Petreli for help with the questionnaire, and to the four scientists who participated in our evaluation. Thanks also to Ben O'Neil for building the JUNG interface.  ... 
dblp:conf/www/AlaniB06 fatcat:3fsijzyqb5f2ja2bitbpoc4idm

LOVBench: Ontology Ranking Benchmark

Niklas Kolbe, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche, Sylvain Kubler, Yves Le Traon
2020 Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020  
With inferred relevance judgments for more than 7000 queries, LOVBench is large enough to perform a comparison study using learning to rank (LTR) with complex ontology ranking models.  ...  In this paper, we first introduce the LOVBench dataset as a benchmark for ontology term ranking.  ...  INTRODUCTION Ontology search provides users with a ranked list of either ontologies 1 or their terms for a given query.  ... 
doi:10.1145/3366423.3380245 dblp:conf/www/KolbeVKT20 fatcat:vuhsuazg55dbfm7fwcvayzibay

Building a biomedical ontology recommender web service

Clement Jonquet, Mark A Musen, Nigam H Shah
2010 Journal of Biomedical Semantics  
The first one is coverage, or the ontologies that provide most terms covering the input text. The second is connectivity, or the ontologies that are most often mapped to by other ontologies.  ...  The number and variety of biomedical ontologies is large, and it is cumbersome for a researcher to figure out which ontology to use.  ...  Acknowledgements This work is supported by NIH grant U54 HG004028 in support of the National Center for Biomedical Ontology.  ... 
doi:10.1186/2041-1480-1-s1-s1 pmid:20626921 pmcid:PMC2903720 fatcat:d7mxashoyjhsbphqqlpsi3ugxq

Ontology Evaluation and Ranking using OntoQA

Samir Tartir, I. Budak Arpinar
2007 International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC 2007)  
Therefore, tools for evaluating and ranking the ontologies are needed.  ...  We also show the effectiveness of OntoQA in ranking ontologies by comparing its results to the ranking of other comparable approaches as well as expert users.  ...  We also compare our results with AKTiveRank [1] (presented in Section 7), which is one of the most comparable ranking approaches, using Pearson's Correlation Coefficient.  ... 
doi:10.1109/icsc.2007.19 dblp:conf/semco/TartirA07 fatcat:vdct6fsh2bh6fihhkxyuqmqdze

Ontology Evaluation and Ranking using OntoQA

Samir Tartir, I. Budak Arpinar
2007 International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC 2007)  
Therefore, tools for evaluating and ranking the ontologies are needed.  ...  We also show the effectiveness of OntoQA in ranking ontologies by comparing its results to the ranking of other comparable approaches as well as expert users.  ...  We also compare our results with AKTiveRank [1] (presented in Section 7), which is one of the most comparable ranking approaches, using Pearson's Correlation Coefficient.  ... 
doi:10.1109/icosc.2007.4338348 fatcat:ln5wfd4mqfcdjd4dosk35tyfmm

Ranking ontologies in the Ontology Building Competition BOC 2014

Ioana Jimborean, Adrian Groza
2014 2014 IEEE 10th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP)  
Due to the constantly increasing amount of ontologies available, the need for tools supporting ontology evaluation and ranking is crucial.  ...  In this paper, we present a Web tool for evaluating and ranking ontologies. The ontologies are evaluated against various structural and semantic metrics.  ...  AktiveRank [1] is a technique for ranking ontologies based on the analysis of concept structures.  ... 
doi:10.1109/iccp.2014.6936983 fatcat:txm3742rffayrgb5py53qpzshi

Ranking Ontologies Based on Formal Concept Analysis

Jianghua Li, Peng Shi, Mingzhi Cheng
2014 Journal of Computers  
Ontology ranking is one of the important functions of ontology search engine and plays an important role for ontology reuse.  ...  On the basis of analyzing the existing ontology ranking methods, we think both the correlation among the ontologies and the matches between the query and ontologies should fully be considered on ranking  ...  Wei Yu [27, 28] , K.Samantha [29] , Zhiguo Ding [30] and Zhang zhiqiang [31] combined the method in Swoogle with the method in AKTiveRank to rank ontologies.  ... 
doi:10.4304/jcp.9.1.215-221 fatcat:xy6c57rcqzgyrf5u7abxefpyzm

Identifying Potentially Important Concepts and Relations in an Ontology [chapter]

Gang Wu, Juanzi Li, Ling Feng, Kehong Wang
2008 Lecture Notes in Computer Science  
More and more ontologies have been published and used widely on the web. In order to make good use of an ontology, especially a new and complex ontology, we need methods to help understand it first.  ...  Our experimental results show that CAR-Rank has a similar convergent speed as the PageRank-like algorithms, but a more reasonable ranking result.  ...  Acknowledgments We would like to thank all the ontology creators who contributed their ranking results, and all the reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.  ... 
doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_3 fatcat:gduwr6h7azgmhex4hmookmm62e

Monte Carlo Study of Taxonomy Evaluation

Alexander Ulanov, Georgy Shevlyakov, Nikolay Lyubomishchenko, Pankaj Mehra, Vladimir Polutin
2010 2010 Workshops on Database and Expert Systems Applications  
AKTiveRank includes several measures of ontology evaluation, e.g., class match, density, betweenness etc.  ...  There are a lot of complex ontology evaluation measures that try to incorporate many aspects of ontology quality: AKTiveRank [15] , Ontometric [16] , OntoClean [17] , On-toQA [18] .  ... 
doi:10.1109/dexa.2010.85 dblp:conf/dexaw/UlanovSLMP10 fatcat:nzgidnxskjesteimonz6h67mwy

Ontology Engineering in Virtual Breeding Environments [chapter]

Dora Simões, Hugo Ferreira, António Lucas Soares
2007 Establishing the Foundation of Collaborative Networks  
Then, the ontologies' ranking and classification method is described, explaining a set of metrics inspired in social network approaches. Finally, the results of preliminary tests are discussed.  ...  Firstly, an overview of the process of ontology composition and decomposition is given and the ontology library system adopted described.  ...  A set of metrics for the ranking and selection of ontology segments were also described. These metrics were exemplified by calculating their values with respect to two ontologies in an experiment.  ... 
doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73798-0_14 dblp:conf/ifip5-5/SimoesFS07 fatcat:o7hk7oncxnemnjuk6mvopzhlr4

Automatic Ontology Identification for Reuse

Mirco Speretta, Susan Gauch
2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'07)  
Our algorithm was able to select the correct domain ontology as the top ranked ontology 8 out of 10 times.  ...  We empirically compare an ontology match score that is based on statistical techniques with simple keyword matching algorithms.  ...  Lately many approaches for searching and reusing ontologies have been proposed. Alani et al. [1] developed AKTiveRank, a prototype system for searching ontologies. For Sabou et al.  ... 
doi:10.1109/wi.2007.79 dblp:conf/webi/SperettaG07 fatcat:yydnx6j7e5esxpm2nioqoap7je

An Ontology Selection and Ranking System Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Adrian Groza, Irina Dragoste, Iulia Sincai, Ioana Jimborean, Vasile Moraru
2014 2014 16th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing  
We address the problem of evaluating, ranking and selecting ontologies according to user preferences.  ...  The system applies different metrics on ontologies in order to feed the Analytic Hierarchy Process with facts.  ...  This work was supported by the Romania-Moldova Bilateral Agreement entitled "ASDEC: Structural Argumentation for Decision Support with Normative Constraints", Adrian Groza is also supported by the Technical  ... 
doi:10.1109/synasc.2014.47 dblp:conf/synasc/GrozaDSJM14 fatcat:qxcldxstkzbmre2ynnnce2hcmq
« Previous Showing results 1 — 15 out of 53 results