Filters








19,354 Hits in 3.6 sec

Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist

Simon Duchesne, Pierre Jannin
2008 NeuroImage  
Our goal is to present a manuscript peer-review checklist to help reviewers achieve this secondary yet critical task in a more systematic fashion.  ...  Results - The checklist is presented in the manuscript, along with a description of a review workflow.  ...  authors There were no medical writers involved in the creation of this manuscript. inserm-00109425, version 1 -10 Oct 2008  ... 
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.065 pmid:18053748 fatcat:274o6rkgxrhmrotf6bdcqlbkme

Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey

Amytis Heim, Philippe Ravaud, Gabriel Baron, Isabelle Boutron
2018 BMC Medicine  
guidelines checklists, blinding peer reviewers to the results (i.e., results-free peer review), giving incentives to peer reviewers, and post-publication peer review).  ...  The preferred study type was RCTs with randomization of manuscripts for four interventions (adding an expert, use of reporting guidelines checklist, results-free peer review, post-publication peer review  ...  The checklist is then sent to the authors so they can revise their manuscript. Comparator Peer reviewers are not asked to fill in a guidelines checklist.  ... 
doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1167-7 pmid:30318018 pmcid:PMC6192007 fatcat:5ejcjniijrazzkrffgjcv4rzv4

Scientific Peer Review: Guidelines for Informative Peer Review. By J. Matthias Starck. Springer Spektrum: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2017; 60 pp.; ISBN: 978-3-658-19915-9

Edmond Sanganyado
2018 Challenges  
A checklist is an important tool that could help in minimizing bias in the peer review process.  ...  In addition to its compact size, another strength of Scientific Peer Review is that it contains a comprehensive checklist that the reader could use for their own peer review assignments.  ... 
doi:10.3390/challe9010006 fatcat:u626smetqbf5zl3qsyyw32ttgy

A survey exploring biomedical editors' perceptions of editorial interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines

David Blanco, Darko Hren, Jamie J. Kirkham, Erik Cobo, Sara Schroter
2019 F1000Research  
Participants believed that checking adherence to guidelines goes beyond the role of peer reviewers and were concerned that the quality of peer review could be compromised.  ...  Reviewers are generally not expected to focus on reporting issues but on providing an expert view on the importance, novelty, and relevance of the manuscript.  ...  The third part is an RCT to evaluate the impact of assessing during peer review the CONSORT checklist submitted by authors 28 .  ... 
doi:10.12688/f1000research.20556.2 pmid:31824668 pmcid:PMC6880264 fatcat:e7qs5ywjybgi5bafkc254axpxm

Development of ARCADIA: a tool for assessing the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research

Cecilia Superchi, Darko Hren, David Blanco, Roser Rius, Alessandro Recchioni, Isabelle Boutron, José Antonio González
2020 BMJ Open  
of the manuscript, Characteristics of peer reviewer's comments).ConclusionAssessment of Review reports with a Checklist Available to eDItors and Authors tool could be used regularly by editors to evaluate  ...  The majority of participants (84%) agreed on the definition of peer-review report quality we proposed.  ...  CS led the writing of the manuscript. IB and JAG led the supervision of the manuscript preparation. All authors provided detailed comments on earlier drafts and approved the final manuscript.  ... 
doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035604 pmid:32518211 fatcat:7b73bqx6gje3lhuhxi5empu6mq

How to write a guideline: a proposal for a manuscript template that supports the creation of trustworthy guidelines

Robby Nieuwlaat, Wojtek Wiercioch, Jan L. Brożek, Nancy Ann Marie Santesso, Robert Kunkle, Pablo Alonso-Coello, David R Anderson, Shannon Bates, Mary Cushman, Philipp Dahm, Alfonso Iorio, Wendy Lim (+11 others)
2021 Blood Advances  
The proposed guideline manuscript template includes: 1) title for guideline identification; 2) abstract, including a summary of key recommendations; 3) overview of all recommendations [executive summary  ...  Our objective was to develop a guideline manuscript template to help authors write a complete and useful report.  ...  The guideline panel chairs and vice chairs proposed to adopt a manuscript template for summarizing panel recommendations for dissemination in peer-reviewed journals.  ... 
doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003577 pmid:34521104 pmcid:PMC8759117 fatcat:eqtjvy62afhehav7kpwgjerc6i

New Opportunities for AJPE Authors

Gayle A Brazeau
2016 American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education  
Manuscripts in this category are subject to peer and/or editorial review.  ...  Authors can find more detailed information and a checklist on what is required for all manuscript submissions on the AJPE website (www.ajpe.org).  ... 
doi:10.5688/ajpe808128 pmid:27899824 pmcid:PMC5116780 fatcat:62tblm4ynnfqvmvoubxyrklnai

Key Factors for Improving Rigor and Reproducibility: Guidelines, Peer Reviews, and Journal Technical Reviews

Hong S. Lu, Alan Daugherty
2022 Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine  
Standard peer reviews and journal-specific technical and statistical reviews are critical factors for enhancing rigor and reproducibility.  ...  To respond to the NIH's policy for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical research, many journals have implemented guidelines and checklists to guide authors in improving the rigor and reproducibility  ...  AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS HL and AD: manuscript design and manuscript editing. HL: manuscript draft. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.  ... 
doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.856102 pmid:35369348 pmcid:PMC8965503 fatcat:bjakh7ycbzcezcqhyg7p7txt54

Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rachel Bruce, Anthony Chauvin, Ludovic Trinquart, Philippe Ravaud, Isabelle Boutron
2016 BMC Medicine  
As compared with the standard peer review process, training did not improve the quality of the peer review report and use of a checklist did not improve the quality of the final manuscript.  ...  Adding a statistical peer review improved the quality of the final manuscript (standardized mean difference (SMD), 0.58; 95 % CI, 0.19 to 0.98).  ...  Availability of data and materials The dataset(s) supporting the conclusions of this article not included in the appendices of this manuscript are available upon request.  ... 
doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0631-5 pmid:27287500 pmcid:PMC4902984 fatcat:h34zra6llvaerlwtge4fz6gsp4

Statistical Reviewing forHeadache

Timothy T. Houle, Donald B. Penzien
2009 Headache  
The purpose of this editorial is to introduce a statistical reviewing checklist that is embedded within these guidelines.  ...  The difficulties in statistical reviewing have been well documented, 1 but a looming question remains: What can our research community do about improving the statistical aspects of peer review?  ...  The purpose of this editorial is to introduce a statistical reviewing checklist that is embedded within these guidelines.  ... 
doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01322.x fatcat:337gkxmupjblxfceq557dyjzla

A survey exploring biomedical editors' perceptions of editorial interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines

David Blanco, Darko Hren, Jamie J. Kirkham, Erik Cobo, Sara Schroter
2019 F1000Research  
Participants believed that checking adherence to guidelines goes beyond the role of peer reviewers and could decrease the overall quality of reviews.  ...  In particular, it gathers editors' perceptions of a range of interventions at various stages in the editorial process.  ...  The third part is an RCT to evaluate the impact of assessing during peer review the CONSORT checklist submitted by authors 28 .  ... 
doi:10.12688/f1000research.20556.1 fatcat:ys3x5xhhqneexngcj4gzqtqdhe

Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal

Claudine Turcotte, Pierre Drolet, Michel Girard
2004 Canadian Journal of Anesthesia  
M Me et th ho od ds s: : Peer review material was analyzed from 213 submissions to the CJA. Characteristics of accepted and rejected manuscripts were compared.  ...  R Re es su ul lt ts s: : Characteristics of 213 manuscripts and comments from 405 reviewers were analyzed. Overall, 57% of manuscripts submitted to the CJA were accepted.  ...  A Ac ck kn no ow wl le ed dg ge em me en nt t We wish to thank the Editor-in-chief of the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Dr.  ... 
doi:10.1007/bf03018396 pmid:15197116 fatcat:qthx45a7o5hhdoldymufvwd54i

ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps

Neal R. Haddaway, Biljana Macura, Paul Whaley, Andrew S. Pullin
2018 Environmental Evidence  
PRISMA is now widely used by a range of journals as a pre-submission checklist.  ...  Collated together, this summary record can help to facilitate rapid review and appraisal of the conduct of a systematic review or map, potentially speeding up the peer-review process.  ...  We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.  ... 
doi:10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7 fatcat:2f3du3wjvvdtzjo65m4asiqs4e

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Benjamin Speich, Sara Schroter, Matthias Briel, David Moher, Iratxe Puebla, Alejandra Clark, Michael Maia Schlüssel, Philippe Ravaud, Isabelle Boutron, Sally Hopewell
2020 BMJ Open  
Peer reviewers and manuscript authors will not be informed of the study hypothesis, design or intervention.  ...  reviewers will receive a reminder and short explanation of the 10 most important and poorly reported CONSORT items; they will be asked to check if these items are reported in the submitted manuscript)  ...  a pilot or feasibility study or animal studies. ► Manuscripts not sent for peer review.  ... 
doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035114 pmid:32198306 pmcid:PMC7103787 fatcat:xwcek6ym3nbnppbw2wmclhvnga

Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research

David Blanco
2019 Zenodo  
Design: Scoping review.  ...  Conclusions: This scoping review identified a wide range of strategies to improve adherence to reporting guidelines that can be taken by different stakeholders.  ...  This review is part of a larger project whose next goals are (1) to capture editors' perceptions on the barriers and facilitators of some promising interventions identified in this review, (2) to explore  ... 
doi:10.5281/zenodo.2707079 fatcat:7npqw2ktdvftnjs4mrbm2hxzfy
« Previous Showing results 1 — 15 out of 19,354 results