A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2021; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
Filters
Impact of h-index on authors ranking: A comparative analysis of Scopus and WoS
[article]
2021
arXiv
pre-print
Preserved Fulltext
In this study, we compare the difference in the h-index compiled with Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) with the aim of analyzing the ranking of the authors within a university. ...
On average 12.4% of publications per author are unique in Scopus and 4.1% in WoS. 53.5% of publications are common in both Scopus and WoS. ...
associated authors and correlation was calculated between the authors rank in Scopus and authors rank in WoS. Similarly, the rank between Scopus and WoS citations was calculated. ...
arXiv:2102.06964v1
fatcat:s2bpzajkn5fkreya3vhhbg5yda
Impact of h-index on authors ranking: An improvement to the h-index for lower-ranked author
[article]
2021
arXiv
pre-print
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2021; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
Here we analyze the publication records of 385 authors from Monash University (Australia) to investigate (i) the impact of different databases like Scopus and WoS on the ranking of authors within a discipline ...
The results show the positive impact of h_c on the lower-ranked authors in every discipline. ...
Acknowledgment Both Scopus and WoS data has been downloaded from the Northwestern University, USA. ...
arXiv:2105.08281v1
fatcat:fuigzrvcjza6jkma4odoqowlk4
Bibliometrics and University Research Rankings Demystified for Librarians
[chapter]
2014
Library and Information Sciences
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2018; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
It focuses on the intersection of bibliometrics and university rankings by updating both the literature and the rankings themselves. Librarians should find it relevant and understandable. ...
In the six years since I first researched university research rankings and bibliometrics, much of the world suffered an economic downturn that has impacted research funding and open access journals, research ...
the original author(s) and source are credited. ...
doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54812-3_10
fatcat:3sqhabfixnduficstpovjdkd6e
What are the top five journals in economics? A new meta-ranking
2017
Applied Economics
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2018; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
We construct a meta-ranking of 277 economics journals based on 22 different rankings. ...
The ranking incorporates bibliometric measures from four different databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and RePEc). ...
Review, Journal of Political Economy, Review of Economic Studies and Econometrica. ...
doi:10.1080/00036846.2017.1332753
fatcat:olbyzawkczcajl2fqdvnapnocu
Evaluating Journal Quality: A Review of Journal Citation Indicators and Ranking in Business and Management
[article]
2016
arXiv
pre-print
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2019; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
Other Versions
We conclude that no one indicator is superior but that the h-index (which includes the productivity of a journal) and SNIP (which aims to normalize for field effects) may be the most effective at the moment ...
Traditionally, journals have been ranked by peer review lists such as that of the Association of Business Schools (UK) or though their journal impact factor (JIF). ...
One of the problems is that the indicators are not all available from the same sourcethe JIF and Eigenfactor come from the WoS; the h-index from the Scimago website; and the SJR and SNIP from Scopus. ...
arXiv:1604.06685v2
fatcat:4jcz5nks4zcihlom2pfki23dha
A follow‐up ranking of academic journals
2009
Journal of Knowledge Management
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2016; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
The h-index and the g-index were employed to develop a ranking list. The revealed preference method was compared to the stated preference approach, also referred to as an expert survey. ...
A comprehensive journal ranking based on the combination of both approaches is presented. ...
Compared to GS, WoS undervalued the citation impact of each author of this paper by five and ten times. ...
doi:10.1108/13673270910931134
fatcat:dqtyijd7zjf75axqsjghy2acdi
Citation analysis and peer ranking of Australian social science journals
2010
Scientometrics
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2020; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
In addition, citation-based indicators including an extended journal impact factor, the h-index, and a modified journal diffusion factor, were calculated to assess whether subsequent analyses influence ...
These data were compared with the tier rankings assigned by disciplinary groups to the journals for the purposes of a new research assessment model, Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA), due to be ...
with ERA rank ERA
rank
h-index
Impact factor
Diffusion factor
Scopus WoS
Scopus WoS
Scopus WoS
A*
5.8
6.4
1.64
1.64
0.64
0.44
A
6
5.8
1.4
1.38
0.54
0.37
B
6
5.9
1.4
1.2
0.65 ...
doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0198-4
fatcat:yehzkcom65czvc55knan7ickri
Ranking of library and information science researchers: Comparison of data sources for correlating citation data, and expert judgments
2010
Journal of Informetrics
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2017; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
H-index values computed using three different sources of citation data: Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and Google Scholar (GS). ...
Forty two LIS experts provided judgments on a five-point scale of the quality of research published by 101 scholars; the median rankings resulting from these judgments were then correlated with h-, g-and ...
We thank the Arts and Humanities Research Council and the China Scholarship Council for funding ...
doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.005
fatcat:d6zaex5wqzc2ddybs3jo2tysli
Evaluating journal quality: A review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management
2017
European Journal of Operational Research
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2018; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
We conclude that no one indicator is superior but that the h-index (which includes the productivity of a journal) and SNIP (which aims to normalise for field effects) may be the most effective at the moment ...
Traditionally, journals have been ranked by peer review lists such as that of the Association of Business Schools (UK) or though their journal impact factor (JIF). ...
One of the problems is that the indicators are not all available from the same source -the JIF and Eigenfactor come from the WoS; the h-index from the Scimago website; and the SJR and SNIP from Scopus. ...
doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.058
fatcat:nex7saadvjeu5c4zappgqz5teu
Comparison of bibliographic data sources: Implications for the robustness of university rankings
[article]
2019
biorxiv/medrxiv
pre-print
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2021; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
Often these are converted to simple, and frequently contested, rankings based on quantitative analysis of those outputs. ...
Both internal and external analyses usually rely on a single data source to define the set of outputs assigned to a specific university. ...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Alberto Martín-Martín and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable feedback, which has helped to improve this article. ...
doi:10.1101/750075
fatcat:k7fkttinazgoxojxwnoque5yku
Exploring the influence of scientific journal ranking on publication performance in the Hungarian social sciences: the case of law and economics
2019
Scientometrics
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2019; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
This finding is contrary to the importance of international journal rankings, such as the SCOPUS Scimago journal ranking or the Web of Science Impact Factor. ...
Using a case study of the Economic and Law Department of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, we find that domestic rankings greatly distort researchers' publication preferences. ...
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were ...
doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03081-4
fatcat:xku565tunnh45bua7wdbtpxkte
Bibliometric Approach to Research Assessment: Publication Count, Citation Count, & Author Rank
2013
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2017; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
faculty members and comparing the rankings by those scores. ...
The study results showed correlation between publication count and citation count for authors with many publications but the opposite evidence for authors with few publications. ...
Li et al. (2010) , who conducted a study correlating the results from an expert survey of publications by researchers with citation-based author scores (e.g., h-index, g-index) using WoS, Scopus, and Google ...
doi:10.1633/jistap.2013.1.1.2
fatcat:qdesqcekurhcrbbh7n2d4afouu
Ranking Iranian biomedical research centers according to H-variants (G, M, A, R) in Scopus and Web of Science
2015
Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2020; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
We conducted a comprehensive bibliometrics analysis to calculate the H, G, M, A and R indicators for all Iranian biomedical research centers (IBRCs) from the output of ISI Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus ...
Furthermore, the highest overlap of the 10 top IBRCs was between G and H in WoS (100%) and between G-R (90%) and H-R (90%) in Scopus. ...
Acknowledgments This study was supported by School of Health and Information Science, Iran University of Medical Sciences in 2012. ...
pmid:26478875
pmcid:PMC4606953
fatcat:266dgym66vbypm3ekt2eshvfzi
Comparison of bibliographic data sources: Implications for the robustness of university rankings
2020
Quantitative Science Studies
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2021; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
We address this gap by performing detailed bibliographic comparisons between Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and Microsoft Academic (MSA) at the institutional level and supplement this with a manual analysis ...
Overall, MSA has greater coverage than Scopus and WoS, but with less complete affiliation metadata. ...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Alberto Martín-Martín and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable feedback, which has helped to improve this article.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Chun ...
doi:10.1162/qss_a_00031
fatcat:cxapjjfx55gfxk4uatomrqs5vq
Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review
2018
PLoS ONE
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2019; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
PLOS ONE | https://doi. ...
Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Chris Brown and Jill Pipher for their reviews and advice on this manuscript, and Nadine Mansour for her assistance with data collection. ...
CWUR rankings are the only ranking system that incorporates the h-index developed by Hirsch [21] to indicate the broad impact of a university's research based on performance and citation impact. ...
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193762
pmid:29513762
pmcid:PMC5841788
fatcat:lhkliuc3u5guflpgyj4qkse3ka
« Previous
Showing results 1 — 15 out of 1,688 results