Filters








19 Hits in 6.2 sec

Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations [article]

Alberto Martín-Martín, Mike Thelwall, Enrique Orduna-Malea, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar
2020 Scientometrics   accepted
A similar pattern held within most subject categories. Microsoft Academic is the second largest overall (60% of all citations), including 82% of Scopus citations and 86% of Web of Science citations.  ...  New sources of citation data have recently become available, such as Microsoft Academic, Dimensions, and the OpenCitations Index of CrossRef open DOI-to-DOI citations (COCI).  ...  of citations found by Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and COCI.  ... 
doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4 pmid:32981987 pmcid:PMC7505221 arXiv:2004.14329v2 fatcat:74wpfemwznhkleebhipn5gmphe

Correction to: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations

Alberto Martín-Martín, Mike Thelwall, Enrique Orduna-Malea, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar
2020 Scientometrics  
3 Fig. 5 5 Distribution of citations that fall within each sector of the Venn diagrams that compare Google Scholar to Microsoft Academic and Dimensions.  ...  Calculated at the level of subject categories, and aggregated by subject areas  ... 
doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03792-z fatcat:dsnlflkbvvcvziqjw6tp554ouq

RISIS Research Seminar: Alternative data sources for bibliometric analyses pros and cons, benefits and caveats

Martijn Visser
2020 Zenodo  
Author presents a large-scale comparison of five multidisciplinary bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic.  ...  More specifically we will present results of an analysis regarding the completeness and accuracy of citation links and the completeness of author affiliations and the degree to which these affiliations  ...  Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.  ... 
doi:10.5281/zenodo.4322973 fatcat:jjot5oj6azesxhaeroulzfxv74

Bases de datos bibliográficas y métricas alternativas

Wenceslao Arroyo-Machado
2021 Zenodo  
Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.  ...  Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20-41.  ... 
doi:10.5281/zenodo.5675731 fatcat:yh7vv4zxavcgjizfftaqioeusi

A map of Digital Humanities research across bibliographic data sources [article]

Gianmarco Spinaci, Giovanni Colavizza, Silvio Peroni
2022 arXiv   pre-print
Computer Science is responsible for a large part of incoming and outgoing citations to and from DH research, which suggests a reciprocal interest between the two disciplines. Value.  ...  Finally, we used a specific time coverage (2000-2018) that could have prevented the inclusion of additional DH publications.  ...  Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, for providing access to their databases and computing facilities.  ... 
arXiv:2108.12190v3 fatcat:zelboraoxjeipmtt3d4prtpgpy

Tema 5 - Fuentes de información para las ciencias sociales [article]

Wenceslao Arroyo-Machado
2021 figshare.com  
Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.  ...  Debido a su cobertura, las principales y más reseñables son: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions y Web of Science.  ... 
doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17125127.v1 fatcat:w3pkj5lys5hddo56xaowhu5spq

Índice h, Google Scholar, Índice h10 e Profile no Google Scholar

Marcos Eduardo Sousa
2020 Zenodo  
(como índice h5), a proposta de um índice h10 para avaliação de periódicos nacionais, o software Publish or Perish e o Profile do Google Scholar  ...  Apresentação realizada a um grupo de editores de periódicos científicos do estado de Minas Gerais - Brasil e ter por objetivo esclarecer com relação ao que é o índice h, sua inserção no Google Scholar  ...  Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, n. 0123456789, 2020.  ... 
doi:10.5281/zenodo.4084725 fatcat:kztnus3365db5fhnoj7qazwdfy

A map of Digital Humanities research across bibliographic data sources

Gianmarco Spinaci, Giovanni Colavizza, Silvio Peroni
2022 Digital Scholarship in the Humanities  
Computer Science is responsible for a large part of incoming and outgoing citations to and from DH research, which suggests a reciprocal interest between the two disciplines.  ...  Finally, we used a specific time coverage (2000–2018) that could have prevented the inclusion of additional DH publications.  ...  Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, for providing access to their databases and computing facilities.  ... 
doi:10.1093/llc/fqac016 fatcat:zjzqqvry5bgvzfgsfnox5wu2sa

Open bibliographic data and the Italian National Scientific Qualification: measuring coverage of academic fields [article]

Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni, Francesco Poggi
2022 arXiv   pre-print
This paper investigates the status of open bibliographic data of three of the most used open resources, namely Microsoft Academic Graph, Crossref and OpenAIRE, evaluating their potentialities as substitutes  ...  of proprietary databases for academic evaluation processes.  ...  al., 2018) , of Microsoft Academic (Huang et al., 2020; Hug & Brändle, 2017) , of both Google Scholar and Microsoft Academic (Harzing 2016; Harzing & Alakangas, 2017a , 2017b) .  ... 
arXiv:2110.02111v2 fatcat:gawvisn27va4tabrvlix6chj4q

Kudos: Improving the Reachability and Research Impact [article]

Nader Ale Ebrahim
2021 figshare.com  
Researchers need tools to disseminate the research findings and publications and make sure that the high quality work of your research reaches to the widest possible audience outside of your academic research  ...  Authors can make their articles more engaging for a digital readership by adding short titles, lay summaries, impact statements and supplementary content.  ...  Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.  ... 
doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14136053.v1 fatcat:pjuza3sv6raffdhbotkaz4tae4

Why IEEE Xplore Matters for Research Trend Analysis in the Energy Sector

B. Chigarev
2021 Energy Systems Research  
The paper aims to briefly compare and analyze the results of queries to IEEE Xplore and the leading abstract databases Scopus and Web of Science to identify research trends.  ...  Some errors were revealed in the Author Keywords in Web of Science.  ...  OpenCitationsCOCI: a multidisciplinary comparison Marugán-Lázaro, and E.  ... 
doi:10.38028/esr.2021.03.0005 fatcat:3wn7kzn4gjdgfplfooq343bhwy

Cómo no hacer un análisis bibliométrico

Wenceslao Arroyo-Machado
2021 Zenodo  
Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.  ...  ERROR #5 Obviar las limitaciones de los datos y posibles sesgos Se hace poca investigación sobre filología hispánica Web of Science Dialnet Lens.org El proceso de consulta en la base de datos requiere  ... 
doi:10.5281/zenodo.5624315 fatcat:sz5n2cchq5grnmzl3as3gkk2tq

Tieteellisen julkaisemisen monimuotoisuus ja tutkimuksen vastuullinen arviointi [article]

Hanna-Mari Puuska, Janne Pölönen
2021 Zenodo  
Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitationsCOCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.  ...  Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Arxiv. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2005/2005.10732.pdf.  ... 
doi:10.5281/zenodo.5807163 fatcat:7d5ek7ylzjb7vn5zeqbft7wtim

Making FAIReR assessments possible. Final report of EOSC Co-Creation projects: "European overview of career merit systems'' and "Vision for research data in research careers"

Henriikka Mustajoki, Janne Pölönen, Kathleen Gregory, Dragan Ivanović, Valerie Brasse, Joonas Kesäniemi, Elina Koivisto, Elina Pylvänäinen
2021 Zenodo  
This report is a deliverable of EOSC Co-Creation projects (i) "European overview of career merit systems" and (ii) "Vision for research data in research careers", funded by the EOSC Co-Creation funding  ...  well-established and emerging international data sources for publication data, such as WOS, Scopus,Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, and Dimensions (Martín-Martín et al., 2020; Visser, van Eck, &  ...  Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar) are imperfect, criticised, and therefore even discouraged to be used for research assessment (e.g.  ... 
doi:10.5281/zenodo.4701374 fatcat:eaobo7wd5fac7emxtsn2uso7ca

Mesurer l'ouverture de la science : le cas de l'Université de Lorraine

Laetitia Bracco
2022 Revue Française des Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication  
and OpenCitationsCOCI : a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations », Scientometrics , Sept. 2020, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary, fig. 1.  ...  URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02141819v1 15 Martín-Martín, Alberto, Thelwall, Mike, Orduna-Malea, Enrique et al., « Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science,  ... 
doi:10.4000/rfsic.12474 fatcat:zkr3r524dvfk7nah5baifyjrr4
« Previous Showing results 1 — 15 out of 19 results