Filters








3 Hits in 1.5 sec

Low-Cost Software Control-Flow Error Recovery

Ghazaleh Nazarian, Razvan Nane, Georgi N. Gaydadjiev
2015 2015 Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design  
In modern safety-critical embedded systems reliability and performance are two important criteria. In many systems based on off-the-shelf processors software implemented error recovery is the only option to improve the reliability of the system. However, software methods typically introduce large performance overheads. Another important factor in error recovery schemes is the recovery time, especially in systems with real-time requirements. A key observation that helps improve software recovery
more » ... methods is that only a defined number of locations in the program are susceptible to errors. In this paper we propose a fast software recovery scheme that instruments the program only at locations vulnerable to control-flow errors. We use a systematic bit-flip analysis to identify the exact locations susceptible to control-flow errors in a given program. This helps us to instrument the code with minimal overheads, while maintaining high-level of correct-ability and low recovery times. Our experiments show that using the result of our bit-flip analysis and limiting the code instrumentation to only the susceptible locations improves the efficiency by a factor of 80 when compared to the latest control-flow error recovery methods.
doi:10.1109/dsd.2015.92 dblp:conf/dsd/NazarianNG15 fatcat:dmn6ri5nlvd5phxpuuk2erdqee

Compatibility Study of Compile-Time Optimizations for Power and Reliability

Ghazaleh Nazarian, Christos Strydis, Georgi Gaydadjiev
2011 2011 14th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design  
Historically compiler optimizations have been used mainly for improving embedded systems performance. However, for a wide range of today's power restricted, battery operated embedded devices, power consumption becomes a crucial problem that is addressed by modern compilers. Biomedical implants are one good example of such embedded systems. In addition to power, such devices need to also satisfy high reliability levels. Therefore, performance, power and reliability optimizations should all be
more » ... sidered while designing and programming implantable systems. Various software optimizations, e.g., during compilation, can provide the necessary means to achieve this goal. Additionally the system can be configured to trade-off between the above three factors based on the specific application requirements. In this paper we categorize previous works on compiler optimizations for low power and fault tolerance. Our study considers differences in instruction count and memory overhead, fault coverage and hardware modifications. Finally, the compatibility of different methods from both optimization classes is assessed. Five compatible pairs that can be combined with few or no limitations have been identified.
doi:10.1109/dsd.2011.108 dblp:conf/dsd/NazarianSG11 fatcat:tjj3wrhepvbihehgxlgjcfrolq

Compiler-aided methodology for low overhead on-line testing

Ghazaleh Nazarian, Robert M. Seepers, Christos Strydis, Georgi N. Gaydadjiev
2013 2013 International Conference on Embedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling, and Simulation (SAMOS)  
Reliability is emerging as an important design criterion in modern systems due to increasing transient fault rates. Hardware fault-tolerance techniques, commonly used to address this, introduce high design costs. As alternative, software Signature-Monitoring (SM) schemes based on compiler assertions are an efficient method for control-flow-error detection. Existing SM techniques do not consider application-specific-information causing unnecessary overheads. In this paper, compile-time
more » ... ow-Graph (CFG) topology analysis is used to place best-suited assertions at optimal locations of the assembly code to reduce overheads. Our evaluation with representative workloads shows fault-coverage increase with overheads close to Assertionbased Control-Flow Correction (ACFC), the method with lowest overhead. Compared to ACFC, our technique improves (on average) fault coverage by 17%, performance overhead by 5% and power-consumption by 3% with equal code-size overhead.
doi:10.1109/samos.2013.6621126 dblp:conf/samos/NazarianSSG13 fatcat:oq3ce2bdefftdnkjpgcscoq5oy